Monday, October 26, 2009

The Nuns Story

I read the New York Times almost daily, and I came across this article about Nuns as second class citizens. I found it interesting.
Published: October 24, 2009

WASHINGTON

Fred R. Conrad/The New York Times

Maureen Dowd

Once, in the first grade, I was late for class. I started crying in the schoolyard, terrified to go in and face the formidable Sister Hiltruda.

Father Montgomery, who looked like a handsome young priest out of a 1930s movie, found me cowering and took my hand, leading me into the classroom.

Sister Hiltruda looked ready to pop, but she couldn’t say a word to me, then or ever. There was no more unassailable patriarchy than the Catholic Church.

Nuns were second-class citizens then and — 40 years after feminism utterly changed America — they still are. The matter of women as priests is closed, a forbidden topic.

In 2004, the cardinal who would become Pope Benedict XVI wrote a Vatican document urging women to be submissive partners, resisting any adversarial roles with men and cultivating “feminine values” like “listening, welcoming, humility, faithfulness, praise and waiting.”

Nuns need to be even more sepia-toned for the über-conservative pope, who was christened “God’s Rottweiler” for his enforcement of orthodoxy. Once a conscripted member of the Hitler Youth, Benedict pardoned a schismatic bishop who claimed that there was no Nazi gas chamber. He also argued on a trip to Africa that distributing condoms could make the AIDS crisis worse.

The Vatican is now conducting two inquisitions into the “quality of life” of American nuns, a dwindling group with an average age of about 70, hoping to herd them back into their old-fashioned habits and convents and curb any speck of modernity or independence.

Nuns who took Vatican II as a mandate for reimagining their mission “started to look uppity to an awful lot of bishops and priests and, of course, the Vatican,” said Kenneth Briggs, the author of “Double Crossed: Uncovering the Catholic Church’s Betrayal of American Nuns.”

The church enabled rampant pedophilia, but nuns who live in apartments and do social work with ailing gays? Sacrilegious! The pope can wear Serengeti sunglasses and expensive red loafers, but shorter hems for nuns? Disgraceful!

“It’s a tragedy because nuns are the jewels of the system,” said Bob Bennett, the Washington lawyer who led the church’s lay inquiry into the pedophilia scandal. “I was of the view that if they had been listened to more, some of this stuff wouldn’t have happened.”

As the Vatican is trying to wall off the “brides of Christ,” Cask of Amontillado style, it is welcoming extreme-right Anglicans into the Catholic Church — the ones who are disgruntled about female priests and openly gay bishops. Il Papa is even willing to bend Rome’s most doggedly held dogma, against married priests — as long as they’re clutching the Anglicans’ Book of Common Prayer.

“Most of the Anglicans who want to move over to the Catholic Church under this deal are people who have scorned women as priests and have scorned gay people,” Briggs said. “The Vatican doesn’t care that these people are motivated by disdain.”

The nuns are pushing back a bit, but it’s hard, since the church has decreed that women can’t be adversarial to men. A nun writing in Commonweal as “Sister X” protests, “American women religious are being bullied.”

She recalls that Bishop Leonard Blair of Toledo, who heads one of the investigations, moved a meeting at the University of Notre Dame off campus to protest a performance of “The Vagina Monologues.” “It is the rare bishop,” Sister X writes, “who has any real understanding of the lives women actually lead.”

The church can be flexible, except with women. Laurie Goodstein, the Times’s religion writer, reported this month on an Illinois woman who had a son with a Franciscan priest. The church agreed to child support but was stingy with money for college and for doctors, once the son got terminal cancer. The priest had never been disciplined and was a pastor in Wisconsin — until he hit the front page. Even then, “Father” Willenborg was suspended only because the woman said that he had pressed her to have an abortion and that he had also had a sexual relationship with a teenager. (Maybe the church shouldn’t be so obdurate on condoms.)

When then-Cardinal Ratzinger was “The Enforcer” in Rome, he investigated and disciplined two American nuns. One, Jeannine Gramick, then of the School Sisters of Notre Dame, founded a ministry to reconcile gays with the church, which regards homosexual desires as “disordered.” The other, Mary Agnes Mansour of the Sisters of Mercy, headed the Michigan Department of Social Services, which, among other things, paid for abortions for poor women.

Marcy Kaptur, a Democratic congresswoman from Toledo and one of Bishop Blair’s flock, got a resolution passed commending nuns for their humble service and sacrifice. “The Vatican’s in another country,” she said. “Maybe people do things differently there. Perhaps the Holy Spirit will intervene.”

Jezebel

My sister went to a catholic high school and went there full of optimism, and graduated the catholic school an atheist. I respected her when she said she had made this change in her feelings towards religion because I felt as though she had been educated enough to make her own opinions. Because of this, I found it rather funny that she decided to name her new puppy Jezebel.

I found the name of her dog ironic for in the Bible, Jezebel is introduced as a Phoenician princess, and ends up marrying King Ahab. She is able to eventually control her husband and convinces her people to commit acts of sexual immorality. Basically, Jezebel is a "wicked" woman, and is associated also with sexual promiscuity.

The reason this is funny that my sisters dog is named Jezebel is due to two different reasons.
One: This annoying little terror of a dog has managed to "own" my sister. She has figured out ways to control her and manipulate Britney to get exactly what she wants. Britney is not the Alpha- Jezebel is the Alpha. And this seemed to be the case between the marriage of King Ahab and his queen.
Two: While Britney's dog is no longer a member of the sexual dog world, (she was spayed) she still has her sexual drive. That little dog will do her little doggy hump with just about anything she can put her little paws on...

See the resemblance? ;)

Church and State


Because I was one of the many unfortunate people to get the flu, I spent many hours last week in front of the television boring myself to death. However, the more and more shows I watched, (from comedies, CSI shows, and documentaries) I realized how many of them made strong references to the Bible. One of the shows had a direct correlation to the Bible because the "murderer" was killing people for their sins, and the entire show dealt with different characters quoting the Bible and explaining why the murderer was killing only certain people: he was making a statement how even the people that appeared to be good citizens in the world were not living sin free.

However, the most interesting show I watched was a documentary on Politicians who would not come out of the closet because they were strong christians and did not want the republican party to turn their backs on them. After watching this show, I became much more curious about how homosexuals are actually portrayed in the Bible. It is bizarre to me how many christian dominations are very accepting of homosexuals, while others will outright condemn it. I have found sound passages that some politicians or people against homosexuals use to support their beleif that homosexuality is a sin.

The first passage is Genesis 19 with the story of Sodom and Gomorrah, and the demands for same gender sex. People exclaim that this section in the Bible condemned all homosexual behavior, including the raping of strangers for the purpose of humilation.

The next passage is Leviticus 18:22, which is translated to "Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is abomination." This also condemns all homosexual behavior and condemns gay ritual sex, or makes having sex in a womans's bed.

The next passage is from Romans 1:26-27 which states, "For ths cause God gave them up unto vile addections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature: And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving themselves that recompence fo their error which was meet." This passage is a little different because it does not deal with homosexuality amongst men, but with women. It shows how sexually active homosexuals will go to hell, and once they are truly "saved" then the homosexuals will become heterosexuals.

Even though the Bible has direct instances where it seems to say that homosexuality is wrong, it also says that we must search for truth and that we are to "love one another." While people are against homosexuality because the bible says that it is against it, those same people are not following the bible because they are not loving one another.

I found an interesting website on what the Bible says, and does not say about homosexuality and it was very enlightening. That documentary about the polititions made me very upset, because these men would vote "NO" on most matters helping the homosexual community, but by doing that they were not helping themselves and holding a double standard, solely because they were afraid of losing votes. Here's the website:
http://www.soulforce.org/article/homosexuality-bible-gay-christian
-sorry I have yet to figure out how to post links.